Lab Experiments – An Overlooked Tool in the Box of Criminology
- Datum: 10.11.2021
- Uhrzeit: 16:00
- Vortragender: Prof. Dr. Christoph Engel (MPI for Research on Collective Goods, Bonn)
- Professor Dr. Christoph Engel is an expert in experimental law and economics, behavioural law and economics, and economic law. He is director and scientific member at the Max Planck Institute for Research on Common Goods (since 2003), Professor at the University of Bonn (2003), and Honorary Professor at the University of Osnabrück (2004).
- Hinweis: 2G rules will apply in the seminar room and during the reception. We will do a hybrid session; i.e. you can also join virtually (Zoom link see below).
- Ort: Freiburg, Fürstenbergstr. 19
- Raum: Seminarraum (F 113) | Gäste sind herzlich eingeladen!
- Gastgeber: Max-Planck-Institut zur Erforschung von Kriminalität, Sicherheit und Recht
- Kontakt: firstname.lastname@example.org
Good fences make good neighbours. The “naturalistic fallacy” is a particularly solid fence. It not only claims that the normative disciplines need not worry about facts. It would actually be a category error if they care. Although at its core the law is a normative discipline, it has not always been that hostile towards facts. But it used to have a rather loose attitude towards empirics. Often, any factual statement “that matters” has been accepted as a legitimate element of legal reasoning. A social scientist would likely disagree. A factual claim is not the same as empirical evidence, most importantly since correlation is not causation. Criminology defines itself as the social science concerned with crime and punishment. This invites a division of labour: to the extent that a normative conclusion in the area of criminal law rests on an empirical claim, it is for criminology to deliver the evidence. Yet what counts as evidence? To a relevant degree, this is not only a question of epistemology. It also is a matter of disciplinary culture. Historically, criminology defines itself as applied sociology. This historical root is a productive one. But it has led the discipline to largely ignore an important source of evidence: experiments under the controlled conditions of the lab. Interestingly, in empirical legal studies, this method is much more established than in criminology, despite the fact that empirical legal studies are much more recent. The talk will explain why lab experiments could be helpful for criminology, and accordingly for the empirical grounding of criminal law, and will illustrate the power with experiments on crime and punishment.
Meeting ID: 849 1605 1539