Search results

Dunkel, W., Gehringer, N., & Hillebrecht, M. (2018). Lebensführung im Altersübergang – Kontinuität und Wandel. In W. Schneider & S. Stadelbacher (Eds.), Der Altersübergang als Neuarrangement von Arbeit und Leben. Kooperative Dienstleistungen für das Alter(n) in Vielfalt (pp. 55–87). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

Dyson, M., & Vogel, B. (2018). Core Principles Compared: The Law's Identity between Substance and Procedure. In M. Dyson & B. Vogel (Eds.), The Limits of Criminal Law: Anglo-German Concepts and Principles (pp. 71–78). Cambridge [et al.]: Intersentia.

Dyson, M., & Vogel, B. (2018). Crime and Tort Compared: The Place of Civil Liability. In M. Dyson & B. Vogel (Eds.), The Limits of Criminal Law: Anglo-German Concepts and Principles (pp. 141–148). Cambridge [et al.]: Intersentia.

Dyson, M., & Vogel, B. (2018). Crime and Medical Compared: Between Autonomy and Public Interest. In M. Dyson & B. Vogel (Eds.), The Limits of Criminal Law: Anglo-German Concepts and Principles (pp. 195–206). Cambridge [et al.]: Intersentia.

Dyson, M., & Vogel, B. (2018). Crime and Regulation Compared: The Limits of Criminalisation. In M. Dyson & B. Vogel (Eds.), The Limits of Criminal Law: Anglo-German Concepts and Principles (pp. 263–272). Cambridge [et al.]: Intersentia.

Dyson, M., & Vogel, B. (2018). Administrative Sanctions Compared: The Limits of Executive Enforcement. In M. Dyson & B. Vogel (Eds.), The Limits of Criminal Law: Anglo-German Concepts and Principles (pp. 333–344). Cambridge [et al.]: Intersentia.

Dyson, M., & Vogel, B. (2018). Alternative Enforcement Compared: Between Punishment and Prevention. In M. Dyson & B. Vogel (Eds.), The Limits of Criminal Law: Anglo-German Concepts and Principles (pp. 397–406). Cambridge [et al.]: Intersentia.

Dyson, M., & Vogel, B. (2018). Counter-Terrorism Compared: The Limits of Fair Attribution. In M. Dyson & B. Vogel (Eds.), The Limits of Criminal Law: Anglo-German Concepts and Principles (pp. 467–478). Cambridge [et al.]: Intersentia.

Dyson, M., & Vogel, B. (2018). Crime and Intelligence Compared: Secrecy and the Limits of a Fair Trial. In M. Dyson & B. Vogel (Eds.), The Limits of Criminal Law: Anglo-German Concepts and Principles (pp. 539–550). Cambridge [et al.]: Intersentia.

Dyson, M., & Vogel, B. (2018). Reflections on Criminal Law in England and Germany. In M. Dyson & B. Vogel (Eds.), The Limits of Criminal Law: Anglo-German Concepts and Principles (pp. 551–576). Cambridge [et al.]: Intersentia.

Engelhart, M. (2018). Victims and the European Convention on Human Rights. In G. Forti (Ed.), C. Mazzucato, A. Visconti, & S. Giavazzi, Victims and Corporations. Legal Challenges and Empirical Findings (pp. 119–136). Milano: Cedam.

Engelhart, M. (2018). Countering Terrorism at the Limits of Criminal Liability in Germany. In M. Dyson & B. Vogel (Eds.), The Limits of Criminal Law: Anglo-German Concepts and Principles (pp. 435–466). Cambridge [et al.]: Intersentia.

Eser, A. (2018). The Role of Comparative Law in Transnational Criminal Justice. In M. Böse, M. Bohlander, A. Klip, & O. Lagodny (Eds.), Justice without borders: essays in honour of Wolfgang Schomburg (pp. 137–158). Leiden [et al.]: Brill.

Eser, A. (2018). Justicia Transicional: Acerca del Acuerdo de Paz Colombiano a Luz de Ulfrid Neumann. In Y. Reyes Alvarado (Ed.), A. Eser, N. Knust, & U. Neumann, ¿Es injusta la justicia transicional? (pp. 35–61). Bogotá: Universidad Externado de Colombia, Centro de Investigación en Filosofía y Derecho.

Frankenhuis, W. E., & de Weerth, C. (2018). Developmental plasticity. In M. H. Bornstein (Ed.), The SAGE Encyclopedia of Lifespan Human Development (pp. 587–588). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc. doi:10.4135/9781506307633.n220

Galain Palermo, P. (2018). Ámbito corporativo y ¿violación de los derechos humanos? En América Latina. In E. Saad-Diniz & V. Vitti de Laurentiz (Eds.), Corrupção, direitos umanos e empresa (pp. 53–82). Belo Horizonte: D’Plácido.

Gerstner, D. (2018). Using Predictive Policing to Prevent Residential Burglary: Findings from the Pilot Project P4 in Baden-Württemberg, Germany. In CEPOL (Ed.), European Law Enforcement Research Bulletin – Special Conference Edition Nr. 4 (pp. 1–11). Luxembourg: European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Training (CEPOL).

Gless, S., & Wahl, T. (2018). A Comparison of the Evolution and Pace of Police and Judicial Cooperation in Criminal Matters: A Race Between Europol and Eurojust? In C. Brière & A. Weyembergh (Eds.), The Needed Balances in EU Criminal Law. Past, Present and Future (pp. 339–354). Oxford [et al.]: Hart Publishing.

Grundies, V. (2018). Regionale Unterschiede in der gerichtlichen Sanktionspraxis in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Eine empirische Analyse. In D. Hermann & A. Pöge (Eds.), Kriminal­sozio­lo­gie. Handbuch für Wissenschaft und Praxis (pp. 295–316). Baden-Baden: Nomos. doi:10.5771/9783845271842-458

Hirsch, P.-A. (2018). Gründe und Grenzen der Rechtssubjektivität. In V. Waibel, M. Ruffing, & D. Wagner (Eds.), Natur und Freiheit. Akten des XII. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses (pp. 2359–2366). Berlin: De Gruyter.