What Might Reduce Crime Does Not Reduce Fear of Crime
Criminologists assess the impact of street lighting and watching-eyes interventions
In a virtual reality study, a team of researchers – including criminologists from the Max Planck Institute for the Study of Crime, Security and Law and the University of Leiden (Netherlands) – find environmental crime reduction interventions may not be effective or may even be counterproductive when it comes to reducing fear of crime (FOC).
It has long been established that changing an environment can reduce crime. For example, increased light in an area has the potential to discourage would-be offenders by making them more visible. Along the same lines, people have been found to be more likely to refrain from committing crimes when observed or in the presence of images of eyes – something that has been dubbed the watching-eyes effect. But do corresponding neighborhood crime reduction interventions double up as measures to reduce fear of crime? What impact do they have on average citizens?
In a first-of-its-kind virtual reality study, criminologists based in Germany, the Netherlands, and the UK – including Patrick McClanahan, Aniek Siezenga, and Jean-Louis van Gelder from the Max Planck Institute for the Study of Crime, Security and Law – found that environmental crime reduction interventions cannot automatically be transferred to fear of crime reduction measures.
Study participants’ perceived fear of crime remained unchanged by increased street lighting. “Motion-activated, dynamic street lighting has been shown to be a factor in deterring offenders. But it doesn’t seem to make people less afraid of crime. This finding was really quite surprising as previous research has shown lighting to be effective at reducing fear of crime. So, our results suggest that light may be more effective in certain conditions than others”, explains Senior Researcher Patrick McClanahan.
When it comes to watching-eyes interventions, they actually led to increased fear of crime levels. “One of the whole reasons watching-eyes work to reduce crime is that they are meant to make people feel slightly uncomfortable and watched”, McClanahan explains. “So it isn’t surprising that such interventions might inadvertently be counterproductive and lead to more fear of crime.”
With high levels of fear of crime associated with people engaging less with their community, lower use of public spaces, and a general sense of overall anxiety, the livability of neighborhoods can be at stake. “In light of these findings, we need to better understand the nuances of such environmental interventions,” adds McClanahan. “We need to find out if and when they can make the average citizen less afraid, but also what unintended consequences they might have.” The researchers aim to build on the results of the study and explore the boundary conditions of such environmental interventions – i.e., the specific circumstances under which an intervention is indeed effective. This could benefit neighborhoods worldwide by reducing fear and anxiety and boosting community engagement and livability.
The study was conducted in cooperation with Universiteit Leiden (Netherlands). Please find more information and a Dutch version of the text on www.universiteitleiden.nl/sociale-wetenschappen/pedagogische-wetenschappen.
About VR in criminology
The Max Planck Institute for the Study of Crime, Security and Law is the leading European research center in the fields of criminal law, criminology and public law. In the Department of Criminology research studies and experiments are conducted with virtual reality and other novel technologies. Virtual reality is a powerful tool in the researcher’s toolbox. It allows researchers to get close to real-world behavior like a field study while retaining the experimental control found in laboratory experiments. Importantly, researchers retain the ability to assess perceptions and attitudes of the participants – an important aspect often assumed and left unexamined. When it comes to crime, this is particularly impactful, as crimes tend to be committed in secret and cannot be observed by traditional study methods. In 2022, the Institute opened its criminological virtual reality research lab MAXLab. It is the first independent research lab to conduct this type of criminological research using virtual reality.