Dangerous Science, Anticipation and the Human Right to Science

Max Planck Guest Lecture

Directions
  • Date: Apr 22, 2026
  • Time: 05:00 PM - 07:00 PM (Local Time Germany)
  • Speaker: Prof. Samantha Besson (Collège de France, Paris)
  • Samantha Besson is a Professor at the Collège de France in Paris where she holds the Chair International Law of Institutions. She is also a Professor of Public International Law and European Law at the University of Fribourg (Switzerland). Samantha Besson’s research interests lie at the crossroads of general international law, European institutional law and legal philosophy. Her areas of specialization are international, European and comparative human rights law and theory, and international and European democracy law and theory. She has been working on the human right to science since 2014 and is currently leading the Swiss National Science Foundation Research Project Institutionalizing the Human Right to Science (2022–25). She was the first Human Rights Delegate of the Swiss Academies of Sciences (2013–2016) and has been a member of the Committee of the Swiss Academy of Humanities and Social Sciences since 2017.
  • Location: Freiburg/Germany, Fürstenbergstr. 19
  • Room: Seminar room (F 113) | Guests are welcome; please register
  • Host: Max Planck Institute for the Study of Crime, Security and Law
  • Contact: c.hillemanns@csl.mpg.de
Dangerous Science, Anticipation and the Human Right to Science
Recent years have seen the emergence of dual-use technologies and, more generally, of scientific research pertaining to technologies that are potentially beneficial to humanity, but that may also harm it in a serious, lasting, and possibly even irreversible way (e.g. genomic editing, geoengineering, or AI). Faced with ‘dangerous science’ – so defined –, the issue of adequate types and content of duties and responsibilities for anticipating both the potential benefits and harms of such science has become more pressing. One framework from which States may derive duties and responsibilities to anticipate both the potential harms and benefits of such science is the human right to enjoy the benefits of scientific progress and its applications, as well as to participate in that progress, under Article 15(1)(b) of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (often referred to as the ‘human right to science’). Not only, indeed, does that right include (i) everyone’s right to access and participate in the scientific enterprise and its organization, and (ii) to access and participate in the benefits of scientific progress, but (iii) it also constitutes a right to be protected against the adverse effects of science. Interestingly, while some duties and responsibilities of scientific anticipation grounded in the human right to science have been briefly mentioned in recent interpretations of this right by United Nations’ rapporteurs and bodies, their specific content, scope, and bearers are still to be fully addressed, and their key potential to drive reform of the precaution-prevention paradigm has yet to be fully leveraged, including through international cooperation. This lecture explores the comparative advantages of the anticipation of duties and responsibilities grounded in the human right to science though a critical examination of the existing international environmental law regime for anticipating the potential harms and benefits of marine geoengineering.
Go to Editor View